Skip to content

Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as ..< #119342

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2024

Conversation

sjwang05
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #112254

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 27, 2023

r? @petrochenkov

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 27, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r? compiler
I'm overloaded with reviews.

@rustbot rustbot assigned wesleywiser and unassigned petrochenkov Dec 27, 2023
.iter()
.map(|x| TokenType::Token(x.clone()))
.chain(inedible.iter().map(|x| TokenType::Token(x.clone()))),
);
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is necessary because otherwise token::Gt won't show up in expected_tokens when we check for it when emitting the diagnostic.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #119407) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #119606) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks @sjwang05, this looks great to me!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 26, 2024

📌 Commit 6dd0772 has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 26, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#103522 (stabilise array methods)
 - rust-lang#113489 (impl `From<&[T; N]>` for `Cow<[T]>`)
 - rust-lang#119342 (Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as `..<`)
 - rust-lang#119562 (Rename `pointer` field on `Pin`)
 - rust-lang#119800 (Document `rustc_index::vec::IndexVec`)
 - rust-lang#120205 (std: make `HEAP` initializer never inline)
 - rust-lang#120277 (Normalize field types before checking validity)
 - rust-lang#120311 (core: add `From<core::ascii::Char>` implementations)
 - rust-lang#120366 (mark a doctest with UB as no_run)
 - rust-lang#120378 (always normalize `LoweredTy` in the new solver)
 - rust-lang#120382 (Classify closure arguments in refutable pattern in argument error)
 - rust-lang#120389 (Add fmease to the compiler review rotation)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7f19365 into rust-lang:master Jan 27, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.77.0 milestone Jan 27, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#119342 - sjwang05:issue-112254, r=wesleywiser

Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as `..<`

Closes rust-lang#112254
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Diagnostic when trying to write exclusive ranges as ..<
6 participants