Skip to content

Rollup of 5 pull requests #105892

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 5 pull requests #105892

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

thomcc and others added 10 commits December 13, 2022 20:53
filter_next
needless_question_mark
bind_instead_of_map
manual_find
derivable_impls
map_identity
redundant_slicing
skip_while_next
unnecessary_unwrap
needless_bool
…, r=lcnr

Suggest a `T: Send` bound for `&mut T` upvars in `Send` generators

Right now, we suggest a `T: Sync` bound for both `&T` and `&mut T` upvars. A user on URLO [found this confusing](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/error-complains-about-missing-sync-but-send-is-whats-missing/86021), so I wrote this quick fix to look at the mutability before making the suggestion.
clippy::complexity fixes

filter_next
needless_question_mark
bind_instead_of_map
manual_find
derivable_impls
map_identity
redundant_slicing
skip_while_next
unnecessary_unwrap
needless_bool

r? `@compiler-errors`
…ckh726

Don't ICE in closure arg borrow suggestion

Fixes rust-lang#105832
Fix `uninlined_format_args` in libtest

Done using clippy with a quick manual review.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 19, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 19, 2022

📌 Commit 2a57493 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 19, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 19, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 2a57493 with merge 4653c93...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 19, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 4653c93 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 19, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4653c93 into rust-lang:master Dec 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Dec 19, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Perf Build Sha
#105889 6af6a153f8272f0004e5a974c4fae67c311ff4fd
#105882 7c79dd261cbb4b4be51b8c4aa4c2a33e5b53c4a8
#105864 e8c1347f45d5c2279826ffa93e3304647357c9f4
#105839 e8db445eb8d5999098b34b3e2de27359f53dfd77
#105682 37a4045b01f2323094e2870e4a4bbfc0a7c121d6

previous master: 1072337890

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@Dylan-DPC Dylan-DPC deleted the rollup-eozolx4 branch December 19, 2022 12:32
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4653c93): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.0% [-1.1%, -0.9%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.2% [-2.6%, -2.0%] 6
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.0% [-1.1%, -0.9%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [0.5%, 4.5%] 22
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.4% [-4.4%, -4.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.2% [2.2%, 2.2%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [1.5%, 3.2%] 17
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Dec 19, 2022

Note for perf triage: these results are noise and stabilized away on the following commit.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants