Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix false positives for unused_parens around unary and binary operations #110257

Merged

Conversation

lukas-code
Copy link
Member

fix #110251

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 12, 2023

r? @oli-obk

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 12, 2023
@lukas-code
Copy link
Member Author

wait why does this parse

fn what() {
    loop { if break {} }
}

but not

fn what() {
    loop { if return {} }
}

is this a bug or a feature?

@DaniPopes
Copy link
Contributor

I believe that can be answered in rust-quiz #20 😄

@lukas-code
Copy link
Member Author

lukas-code commented Apr 12, 2023

Yeah, looks like this is a feature, and removing the parens can change behavior, so not linting to remove them is correct.

@lukas-code
Copy link
Member Author

I pushed a second commit to deal with break more correctly.

@lukas-code lukas-code force-pushed the why-would-anyone-write-code-like-that-anyway branch from 8eb0bc9 to 0d0949d Compare April 13, 2023 16:13
@lukas-code lukas-code changed the title fix false positive for unused_parens around binary operations fix false positive for unused_parens around unary and binary operations Apr 13, 2023
@lukas-code lukas-code changed the title fix false positive for unused_parens around unary and binary operations fix false positives for unused_parens around unary and binary operations Apr 13, 2023
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Apr 17, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 17, 2023

📌 Commit 0d0949d has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 17, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104055 (Migrate diagnostics in `rustc_borrowck`)
 - rust-lang#110257 (fix false positives for `unused_parens` around unary and binary operations)
 - rust-lang#110313 (allow `repr(align = x)` on inherent methods)
 - rust-lang#110337 (Correct default value for default-linker-libraries)
 - rust-lang#110386 (Clean up traversal macros)
 - rust-lang#110394 (Various minor Idx-related tweaks)
 - rust-lang#110425 (Encode def span for `ConstParam`)
 - rust-lang#110434 (Check freeze with right param-env in `deduced_param_attrs`)
 - rust-lang#110455 (tests: adapt for LLVM change 5b386b8)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 06d12f6 into rust-lang:master Apr 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 17, 2023
@lukas-code lukas-code deleted the why-would-anyone-write-code-like-that-anyway branch April 17, 2023 18:49
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

false positive for unused_parens with binary op if rhs needs parens
5 participants