Skip to content

Account for ref and mut in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming #117289

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

estebank
Copy link
Contributor

If the user writes S { ref field: name } instead of S { field: ref name }, we suggest the correct code.

Fix #72298.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 27, 2023

r? @cjgillot

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Oct 27, 2023
…ming

If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of
`S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.

Fix rust-lang#72298.
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 31, 2023

📌 Commit b589f47 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 31, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit b589f47 with merge e8db74b...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
Account for `ref` and `mut` in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming

If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of `S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.

Fix rust-lang#72298.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 1, 2023

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Nov 1, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@estebank
Copy link
Contributor Author

estebank commented Nov 1, 2023

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 1, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 1, 2023

⌛ Testing commit b589f47 with merge b0a0759...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 1, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing b0a0759 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 1, 2023
@bors bors merged commit b0a0759 into rust-lang:master Nov 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.75.0 milestone Nov 1, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b0a0759): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.8% [1.3%, 4.2%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.1% [2.2%, 3.8%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.3% [-2.3%, -2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.1% [-2.3%, 4.2%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 638.227s -> 638.942s (0.11%)
Artifact size: 304.50 MiB -> 304.49 MiB (-0.00%)

bors-ferrocene bot added a commit to ferrocene/ferrocene that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
80: Automated pull from upstream `master` r=tshepang a=github-actions[bot]


This PR pulls the following changes from the upstream repository:

* rust-lang/rust#117498
  * rust-lang/rust#117488
  * rust-lang/rust#117441
  * rust-lang/rust#117373
  * rust-lang/rust#117298
* rust-lang/rust#117029
* rust-lang/rust#117289
* rust-lang/rust#117307
* rust-lang/rust#114208
* rust-lang/rust#117482
  * rust-lang/rust#117475
  * rust-lang/rust#117401
  * rust-lang/rust#117397
  * rust-lang/rust#115626
* rust-lang/rust#117436
* rust-lang/rust#115356
* rust-lang/rust#117422
* rust-lang/rust#116692



Co-authored-by: David CARLIER <devnexen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Taiki Endo <te316e89@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ltdk <usr@ltdk.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Mehri <ryan.mehri1@gmail.com>
@estebank estebank deleted the issue-72298 branch November 9, 2023 05:12
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unhelpful message for syntax error in pattern bindings
6 participants