Skip to content

Remove #[rustc_host], use internal desugaring #118605

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

fee1-dead
Copy link
Member

Also removed a way for users to explicitly specify the host param since that isn't particularly useful. This should eliminate any pain with encoding attributes across crates and etc.

r? @compiler-errors

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me when green

} else {
0
pub const fn hmm<T>() -> usize {
// FIXME(const_trait_impl): maybe we should have a way to refer to the (hidden) effect param
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could be a const intrinsic that just looks like this code does!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, might be nice to base const_eval_select and others on a single const function that returns a bool in the future.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 4, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #118602) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@fee1-dead
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=compiler-errors

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2023

📌 Commit 65212a0 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 5, 2023
fee1-dead added a commit to fee1-dead-contrib/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
…=compiler-errors

Remove `#[rustc_host]`, use internal desugaring

Also removed a way for users to explicitly specify the host param since that isn't particularly useful. This should eliminate any pain with encoding attributes across crates and etc.

r? `@compiler-errors`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
…fee1-dead

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117922 (Tweak unclosed generics errors)
 - rust-lang#117981 (Remove deprecated `--check-cfg` syntax)
 - rust-lang#118471 (Fix typos in README.md)
 - rust-lang#118488 (Change prefetch to avoid deadlock)
 - rust-lang#118605 (Remove `#[rustc_host]`, use internal desugaring)
 - rust-lang#118608 (Use default params until effects in desugaring)
 - rust-lang#118614 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#118637 (rustc_symbol_mangling,rustc_interface,rustc_driver_impl: Enforce `rustc::potential_query_instability` lint)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
…=compiler-errors

Remove `#[rustc_host]`, use internal desugaring

Also removed a way for users to explicitly specify the host param since that isn't particularly useful. This should eliminate any pain with encoding attributes across crates and etc.

r? ``@compiler-errors``
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 65212a0 with merge f32d298...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: compiler-errors
Pushing f32d298 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 6, 2023
@bors bors merged commit f32d298 into rust-lang:master Dec 6, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.76.0 milestone Dec 6, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f32d298): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.3% [-1.3%, -1.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.7% [2.6%, 2.8%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.9% [4.0%, 5.8%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-9.1% [-9.3%, -8.9%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.7% [2.6%, 2.8%] 2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
6.6% [0.6%, 8.8%] 4
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 675.976s -> 675.798s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 314.13 MiB -> 314.21 MiB (0.02%)

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants