Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once #121860

mu001999 · 2024-03-01T17:00:04Z

As @Nilstrieb said in #121828 (comment):

Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that
there's a tidy check already for sorting

We can get the tidy check error:

tidy check
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used
tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used

r? @Nilstrieb

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs

bors · 2024-03-01T22:26:24Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #121859) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs

Noratrieb

Did a proper review of it, and I think the algorithm can be simplified. After that, happy to merge! I was surprised to see that the performance of it is still really good, not being slower than before.. I guess compute is just so cheap compared to (my quite fast!) disk :)

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_alphabetical.rs

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs

Noratrieb · 2024-03-04T19:28:30Z

Awesome, thanks!
@bors r+

bors · 2024-03-04T19:28:33Z

📌 Commit d88c7ff has been approved by Nilstrieb

It is now in the queue for this repository.

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As `@Nilstrieb` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? `@Nilstrieb`

Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121065 (Add basic i18n guidance for `Display`) - rust-lang#121202 (Limit the number of names and values in check-cfg diagnostics) - rust-lang#121213 (Add an example to demonstrate how Rc::into_inner works) - rust-lang#121262 (Add vector time complexity) - rust-lang#121287 (Clarify/add `must_use` message for Rc/Arc/Weak::into_raw.) - rust-lang#121664 (Adjust error `yield`/`await` lowering) - rust-lang#121838 (Use the correct logic for nested impl trait in assoc types) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#121913 (Don't panic when waiting on poisoned queries) - rust-lang#121959 (Removing absolute path in proc-macro) - rust-lang#121975 (hir_analysis: enums return `None` in `find_field`) - rust-lang#121978 (Fix duplicated path in the "not found dylib" error) - rust-lang#121987 (pattern analysis: abort on arity mismatch) - rust-lang#121993 (Avoid using unnecessary queries when printing the query stack in panics) - rust-lang#121997 (interpret/cast: make more matches on FloatTy properly exhaustive) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

mu001999 · 2024-03-09T08:46:24Z

Is there anything wrong? Why hasn't this PR been merged yet 🤔

Noratrieb · 2024-03-09T09:52:38Z

it's in the queue, weird.

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As `@Nilstrieb` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? `@Nilstrieb`

Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#99153 (Add Read Impl for &Stdin) - rust-lang#112136 (Add std::ffi::c_str module) - rust-lang#120504 (Vec::try_with_capacity) - rust-lang#121280 (Implement MaybeUninit::fill{,_with,_from}) - rust-lang#121813 (Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation) - rust-lang#121833 (Suggest correct path in include_bytes!) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#122160 (Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics) - rust-lang#122178 (ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 18) - rust-lang#122186 (Remove a workaround for a bug) - rust-lang#122215 (Some tweaks to the parallel query cycle handler) - rust-lang#122223 (Fix typo in `VisitorResult`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As ``@Nilstrieb`` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? ``@Nilstrieb``

…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121567 (Avoid some interning in bootstrap) - rust-lang#121813 (Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#121907 (skip sanity check for non-host targets in `check` builds) - rust-lang#122160 (Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics) - rust-lang#122178 (ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 18) - rust-lang#122186 (Remove a workaround for a bug) - rust-lang#122187 (Move metadata header and version checks together) - rust-lang#122215 (Some tweaks to the parallel query cycle handler) - rust-lang#122223 (Fix typo in `VisitorResult`) - rust-lang#122232 (library/core: fix a comment, and a cfg(miri) warning) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Nadrieril · 2024-03-09T20:38:08Z

@bors rollup

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As `@Nilstrieb` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? `@Nilstrieb`

…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121561 (Detect typos for compiletest test directives) - rust-lang#121567 (Avoid some interning in bootstrap) - rust-lang#121685 (Fixing shellcheck comments on lvi test script) - rust-lang#121833 (Suggest correct path in include_bytes!) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#121907 (skip sanity check for non-host targets in `check` builds) - rust-lang#122029 (When displaying multispans, ignore empty lines adjacent to `...`) - rust-lang#122221 (match lowering: define a convenient struct) - rust-lang#122244 (fix: LocalWaker memory leak and some stability attributes) - rust-lang#122251 (Add test to check unused_lifetimes don't duplicate "parameter is never used" error) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As ``@Nilstrieb`` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? ``@Nilstrieb``

…kingjubilee Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#112136 (Add std::ffi::c_str module) - rust-lang#113525 (Dynamically size sigaltstk in std) - rust-lang#121561 (Detect typos for compiletest test directives) - rust-lang#121685 (Fixing shellcheck comments on lvi test script) - rust-lang#121833 (Suggest correct path in include_bytes!) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#122125 (Revert back to Git-for-Windows for MinGW CI builds) - rust-lang#122221 (match lowering: define a convenient struct) - rust-lang#122251 (Add test to check unused_lifetimes don't duplicate "parameter is never used" error) - rust-lang#122264 (add myself to rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As ```@Nilstrieb``` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? ```@Nilstrieb```

…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#112136 (Add std::ffi::c_str module) - rust-lang#113525 (Dynamically size sigaltstk in std) - rust-lang#121685 (Fixing shellcheck comments on lvi test script) - rust-lang#121833 (Suggest correct path in include_bytes!) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#122125 (Revert back to Git-for-Windows for MinGW CI builds) - rust-lang#122221 (match lowering: define a convenient struct) - rust-lang#122244 (fix: LocalWaker memory leak and some stability attributes) - rust-lang#122251 (Add test to check unused_lifetimes don't duplicate "parameter is never used" error) - rust-lang#122264 (add myself to rotation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As ````@Nilstrieb```` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? ````@Nilstrieb````

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As `````@Nilstrieb````` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? `````@Nilstrieb`````

…iaskrgr Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#112136 (Add std::ffi::c_str module) - rust-lang#113525 (Dynamically size sigaltstk in std) - rust-lang#121567 (Avoid some interning in bootstrap) - rust-lang#121642 (Update a test to support Symbol Mangling V0) - rust-lang#121685 (Fixing shellcheck comments on lvi test script) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#121942 (std::rand: enable getrandom for dragonflybsd too.) - rust-lang#122125 (Revert back to Git-for-Windows for MinGW CI builds) - rust-lang#122221 (match lowering: define a convenient struct) - rust-lang#122244 (fix: LocalWaker memory leak and some stability attributes) - rust-lang#122251 (Add test to check unused_lifetimes don't duplicate "parameter is never used" error) - rust-lang#122264 (add myself to rotation) - rust-lang#122269 (doc/rustc: Move loongarch64-unknown-linux-musl to Tier 3) - rust-lang#122271 (Fix legacy numeric constant diag items) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Rollup merge of rust-lang#121860 - mu001999:master, r=Nilstrieb Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once As ``````@Nilstrieb`````` said in rust-lang#121828 (comment): > Might make sense to have a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once in the source code and lint for that there's a tidy check already for sorting We can get the tidy check error: ``` tidy check tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_const_eval/messages.ftl: message `const_eval_invalid_align` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_lint/messages.ftl: message `lint_trivial_untranslatable_diag` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_invalid_literal_suffix` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_infer/messages.ftl: message `infer_need_type_info_in_coroutine` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_expr_not_allowed_in_context` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_passes/messages.ftl: message `passes_layout` is not used tidy error: /path/to/rust/compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl: message `parse_not_supported` is not used ``` r? ``````@Nilstrieb``````

rustbot assigned Noratrieb Mar 1, 2024

Noratrieb reviewed Mar 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

mu001999 force-pushed the master branch 4 times, most recently from 8105e5f to 976a5ca Compare March 2, 2024 01:15

fee1-dead reviewed Mar 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

mu001999 force-pushed the master branch from 976a5ca to 8aeaf75 Compare March 2, 2024 15:12

Noratrieb reviewed Mar 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_alphabetical.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/tools/tidy/src/fluent_used.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

mu001999 force-pushed the master branch from 8aeaf75 to de66af3 Compare March 2, 2024 16:54

mu001999 added 2 commits March 3, 2024 00:57

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once

c3954b3

Remove unused fluent messages

d88c7ff

mu001999 force-pushed the master branch from de66af3 to d88c7ff Compare March 2, 2024 16:58

mu001999 requested a review from Noratrieb March 4, 2024 15:03

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 4, 2024

jhpratt mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2024

Rollup of 15 pull requests #122008

Closed

jhpratt mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2024

Rollup of 12 pull requests #122229

Closed

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2024

Rollup of 11 pull requests #122236

Closed

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2024

Rollup of 10 pull requests #122260

Closed

workingjubilee mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024

Rollup of 10 pull requests #122265

Closed

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024

Rollup of 10 pull requests #122273

Closed

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024

Rollup of 11 pull requests #122280

Closed

jhpratt mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024

Rollup of 12 pull requests #122281

Closed

matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024

Rollup of 14 pull requests #122283

Merged

bors merged commit fdcd051 into rust-lang:master Mar 10, 2024

rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 10, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once #121860

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once #121860

Uh oh!

mu001999 commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 1, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Noratrieb left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Noratrieb commented Mar 4, 2024

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 4, 2024

Uh oh!

mu001999 commented Mar 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Noratrieb commented Mar 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Nadrieril commented Mar 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once #121860

Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once #121860

Uh oh!

Conversation

mu001999 commented Mar 1, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 1, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Noratrieb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Noratrieb commented Mar 4, 2024

Uh oh!

bors commented Mar 4, 2024

Uh oh!

mu001999 commented Mar 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Noratrieb commented Mar 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Nadrieril commented Mar 9, 2024

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mu001999 commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading