Eagerly translate HelpUseLatestEdition in parser diagnostics
#122160
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
…latest-edition, r=cjgillot Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics Fixes rust-lang#122130. This makes me suspicious of these other two usage of `add_to_diagnostic()`. Would they *also* crash? I haven't attempted to construct test cases for them. ``` compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs 3453: errors::HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(e); compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs 2603: HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(&mut err); ``` This also seems like a footgun?
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#99153 (Add Read Impl for &Stdin) - rust-lang#112136 (Add std::ffi::c_str module) - rust-lang#120504 (Vec::try_with_capacity) - rust-lang#121280 (Implement MaybeUninit::fill{,_with,_from}) - rust-lang#121813 (Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation) - rust-lang#121833 (Suggest correct path in include_bytes!) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#122160 (Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics) - rust-lang#122178 (ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 18) - rust-lang#122186 (Remove a workaround for a bug) - rust-lang#122215 (Some tweaks to the parallel query cycle handler) - rust-lang#122223 (Fix typo in `VisitorResult`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
…latest-edition, r=cjgillot Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics Fixes rust-lang#122130. This makes me suspicious of these other two usage of `add_to_diagnostic()`. Would they *also* crash? I haven't attempted to construct test cases for them. ``` compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs 3453: errors::HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(e); compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs 2603: HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(&mut err); ``` This also seems like a footgun?
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121567 (Avoid some interning in bootstrap) - rust-lang#121813 (Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation) - rust-lang#121860 (Add a tidy check that checks whether the fluent slugs only appear once) - rust-lang#121907 (skip sanity check for non-host targets in `check` builds) - rust-lang#122160 (Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics) - rust-lang#122178 (ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 18) - rust-lang#122186 (Remove a workaround for a bug) - rust-lang#122187 (Move metadata header and version checks together) - rust-lang#122215 (Some tweaks to the parallel query cycle handler) - rust-lang#122223 (Fix typo in `VisitorResult`) - rust-lang#122232 (library/core: fix a comment, and a cfg(miri) warning) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#121358 (Reduce alignment of TypeId to u64 alignment) - rust-lang#121813 (Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation) - rust-lang#122160 (Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics) - rust-lang#122178 (ci: add a runner for vanilla LLVM 18) - rust-lang#122187 (Move metadata header and version checks together) - rust-lang#122209 (fix incorrect path resolution in tidy) - rust-lang#122215 (Some tweaks to the parallel query cycle handler) - rust-lang#122223 (Fix typo in `VisitorResult`) - rust-lang#122224 (Add missing regression tests) - rust-lang#122232 (library/core: fix a comment, and a cfg(miri) warning) - rust-lang#122233 (miri: do not apply aliasing restrictions to Box with custom allocator) - rust-lang#122237 (Remove `Ord` from `ClosureKind`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122160 - jieyouxu:eager-translate-help-use-latest-edition, r=cjgillot Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics Fixes rust-lang#122130. This makes me suspicious of these other two usage of `add_to_diagnostic()`. Would they *also* crash? I haven't attempted to construct test cases for them. ``` compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs 3453: errors::HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(e); compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs 2603: HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(&mut err); ``` This also seems like a footgun?
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #122130.
This makes me suspicious of these other two usage of
add_to_diagnostic(). Would they also crash? I haven't attempted to construct test cases for them.This also seems like a footgun?