Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions #124099
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @davidtwco rustbot has assigned @davidtwco. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
voidc
force-pushed
the
disallow-ambiguous-expr-attrs
branch
from
48bbfb3 to
1dfab20
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
voidc
force-pushed
the
disallow-ambiguous-expr-attrs
branch
from
1dfab20 to
14ac49e
Compare
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
voidc
force-pushed
the
disallow-ambiguous-expr-attrs
branch
from
14ac49e to
d877220
Compare
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
voidc
force-pushed
the
disallow-ambiguous-expr-attrs
branch
from
d877220 to
5af861c
Compare
davidtwco
approved these changes
Apr 23, 2024
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123050 (panic_str only exists for the migration to 2021 panic macros) - rust-lang#124067 (weak lang items are not allowed to be #[track_caller]) - rust-lang#124099 (Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions) - rust-lang#124284 (parser: remove unused(no reads) max_angle_bracket_count field) - rust-lang#124288 (remove `push_trait_bound_inner`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#124099 - voidc:disallow-ambiguous-expr-attrs, r=davidtwco Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions This implements the suggestion in [rust-lang#15701](rust-lang#15701 (comment)) to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of `stmt_expr_attributes`.
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2024
…s, r=davidtwco Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions This implements the suggestion in [rust-lang#15701](rust-lang#15701 (comment)) to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of `stmt_expr_attributes`.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 on beta to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? `@wesleywiser` This is the revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta that I mentioned in rust-lang#126101, in case that's what you also wanted. Opening as draft in case it's not. I'm not well-versed in these backports, so I hope I did it right 😓
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? `@wesleywiser` Opening as draft so that `@wesleywiser` and `@apiraino,` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126101 - lqd:revert-124099, r=wesleywiser Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
calebcartwright
pushed a commit
to calebcartwright/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
…s, r=davidtwco Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions This implements the suggestion in [rust-lang#15701](rust-lang#15701 (comment)) to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of `stmt_expr_attributes`.
calebcartwright
pushed a commit
to calebcartwright/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This implements the suggestion in #15701 to disallow ambiguous outer attributes on expressions. This should resolve one of the concerns blocking the stabilization of
stmt_expr_attributes.