[beta] Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta #126102
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
wesleywiser
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2024
|
The revert looks correct to me so: @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
|
@bors p=1 Beta backport |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 on beta to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? `@wesleywiser` This is the revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta that I mentioned in rust-lang#126101, in case that's what you also wanted. Opening as draft in case it's not. I'm not well-versed in these backports, so I hope I did it right 😓
|
A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain) Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
no way, beta CI is borked and we may need to backport #126011 the other beta backport also failed because of this |
Merged
|
This will be landing with #126093 |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports - Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761 - Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908 - Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978 - Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184 - Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392 - Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489 - ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734 - Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061 - Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101 - Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011 r? cuviper
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? `@wesleywiser` Opening as draft so that `@wesleywiser` and `@apiraino,` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#126101 - lqd:revert-124099, r=wesleywiser Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2024
[beta] backports - Fix insufficient logic when searching for the underlying allocation rust-lang#124761 - Handle field projections like slice indexing in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124908 - Handle Deref expressions in invalid_reference_casting rust-lang#124978 - Fix ICE in non-operand `aggregate_raw_ptr` instrinsic codegen rust-lang#125184 - Wrap Context.ext in AssertUnwindSafe rust-lang#125392 - Revert problematic opaque type change rust-lang#125489 - ast: Revert a breaking attribute visiting order change rust-lang#125734 - Update to LLVM 18.1.7 rust-lang#126061 - Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on beta rust-lang#126102 / rust-lang#126101 - Silence double-symlink errors while building solaris toolchain rust-lang#126011 r? cuviper
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
Revert "Disallow ambiguous attributes on expressions" on nightly As discussed in [today's t-compiler meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202024-06-06/near/443079505), this reverts PR rust-lang#124099 to fix P-critical beta regressions rust-lang#125199. r? ``@wesleywiser`` Opening as draft so that ``@wesleywiser`` and ``@apiraino,`` you can tell me whether you wanted: 1. a `beta-accepted` revert of rust-lang#124099 on nightly (this PR)? That will need to be backported to beta (even though rust-lang#126093 may be the last of those) 2. a revert of rust-lang#124099 on beta? 3. all of the above? I also opened rust-lang#126102, another draft PR to revert rust-lang#124099 on beta, should you choose options 2 or 3.
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in today's t-compiler meeting, this reverts PR #124099 on beta to fix P-critical beta regressions #125199.
r? @wesleywiser
This is the revert of #124099 on beta that I mentioned in #126101, in case that's what you also wanted. Opening as draft in case it's not.
I'm not well-versed in these backports, so I hope I did it right 😓