Skip to content

Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints #125913

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

fmease
Copy link
Member

@fmease fmease commented Jun 3, 2024

Implement the various "(note to myself) in a follow-up PR we should turn parts of this message into a subdiagnostic (help msg or even struct sugg)" drive-by comments I left in #124417 during my review.

For context, before #124417, only a few early lints touched/decorated/customized their diagnostic because the former API made it a bit awkward. Likely because of that, things that should've been subdiagnostics were just crammed into the primary message. This PR rectifies this.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 3, 2024

r? @Nadrieril

rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 3, 2024
@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

ty!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 10, 2024

📌 Commit b2949ff has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 10, 2024
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
…diags, r=Nadrieril

Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints

Implement the various "*(note to myself) in a follow-up PR we should turn parts of this message into a subdiagnostic (help msg or even struct sugg)*" drive-by comments I left in rust-lang#124417 during my review.

For context, before rust-lang#124417, only a few early lints touched/decorated/customized their diagnostic because the former API made it a bit awkward. Likely because of that, things that should've been subdiagnostics were just crammed into the primary message. This PR rectifies this.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125913 (Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints)
 - rust-lang#126140 (Rename `std::fs::try_exists` to  `std::fs::exists` and stabilize fs_try_exists)
 - rust-lang#126234 (Delegation: fix ICE on late diagnostics)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125913 (Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints)
 - rust-lang#126234 (Delegation: fix ICE on late diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#126253 (Simplify assert matchers in `run-make-support`)
 - rust-lang#126257 (Rename `needs-matching-clang` to `needs-force-clang-based-tests`)
 - rust-lang#126259 (reachable computation: clarify comments around consts)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 81ff9b5 into rust-lang:master Jun 11, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.81.0 milestone Jun 11, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125913 - fmease:early-lints-spruce-up-some-diags, r=Nadrieril

Spruce up the diagnostics of some early lints

Implement the various "*(note to myself) in a follow-up PR we should turn parts of this message into a subdiagnostic (help msg or even struct sugg)*" drive-by comments I left in rust-lang#124417 during my review.

For context, before rust-lang#124417, only a few early lints touched/decorated/customized their diagnostic because the former API made it a bit awkward. Likely because of that, things that should've been subdiagnostics were just crammed into the primary message. This PR rectifies this.
@fmease fmease deleted the early-lints-spruce-up-some-diags branch June 11, 2024 11:34
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants