Migrate incr-add-rust-src-component and issue-84395-lto-embed-bitcode run-make tests to rmake
#128562
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-run-make
|
This PR modifies cc @jieyouxu |
Oneirical
force-pushed
the
no-contest-expected
branch
from
68eaebb to
84d0649
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Oneirical
force-pushed
the
no-contest-expected
branch
from
84d0649 to
25380bc
Compare
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2024
Migrate `incr-add-rust-src-component` and `issue-84395-lto-embed-bitcode` `run-make` tests to rmake Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html). In `incr-add-rust-src-component`, I directly modify the sysroot, unlike the original test which used a symlink. This is probably a very bad idea, but I want to see what happens. try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #128361) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Oneirical
force-pushed
the
no-contest-expected
branch
from
25380bc to
76a7e72
Compare
|
@bors try (the @rustbot review About the sysroot problem: the original test creates a symbolic link to the sysroot and starts editing it - how does this not just follow the link to the real sysroot and break the test? The syslink feature in This means it's supposed to make the current working directory a link to another place while simultaneously keeping all its contents. This is some quantum physics wormhole stuff. |
|
@Oneirical: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2024
Migrate `incr-add-rust-src-component` and `issue-84395-lto-embed-bitcode` `run-make` tests to rmake Part of rust-lang#121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html). In `incr-add-rust-src-component`, I directly modify the sysroot, unlike the original test which used a symlink. This is probably a very bad idea, but I want to see what happens. try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2024
…nks, r=<try> bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. Because I wasn't super sure about `std::fs::remove_dir_all`'s behavior and to catch `std::fs::remove_dir_all`'s behavioral changes here on forward, I added a collection of tests that checks if our expectation of the behavior of `std::fs::remove_dir_all` and its underlying Unix syscalls and Win32 APIs matches with its actual behavior. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows: ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2024
…nks, r=<try> bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
tgross35
added a commit
to tgross35/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
tgross35
added a commit
to tgross35/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2024
…iler-errors compiletest: use `std::fs::remove_dir_all` now that it is available It turns out `aggressive_rm_rf` is not sufficiently aggressive (RAGEY) on Windows and obviously handles Windows symlinks incorrectly. Instead of rolling our own version, let's use `std::fs::remove_dir_all` now that it's available (well, it's been available for a good while, but probably wasn't available when this helper was written). cc rust-lang#129187 since basically this is failing due to similar problems. Blocker for rust-lang#128562. Fixes rust-lang#129155. Fixes rust-lang#126334.
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
…links, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
jieyouxu
added a commit
to jieyouxu/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
…iler-errors compiletest: use `std::fs::remove_dir_all` now that it is available It turns out `aggressive_rm_rf` is not sufficiently aggressive (RAGEY) on Windows and obviously handles Windows symlinks incorrectly. Instead of rolling our own version, let's use `std::fs::remove_dir_all` now that it's available (well, it's been available for a good while, but probably wasn't available when this helper was written). cc rust-lang#129187 since basically this is failing due to similar problems. Blocker for rust-lang#128562. Fixes rust-lang#129155. Fixes rust-lang#126334.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129302 - jieyouxu:compiletest-RAGEY, r=compiler-errors compiletest: use `std::fs::remove_dir_all` now that it is available It turns out `aggressive_rm_rf` is not sufficiently aggressive (RAGEY) on Windows and obviously handles Windows symlinks incorrectly. Instead of rolling our own version, let's use `std::fs::remove_dir_all` now that it's available (well, it's been available for a good while, but probably wasn't available when this helper was written). cc rust-lang#129187 since basically this is failing due to similar problems. Blocker for rust-lang#128562. Fixes rust-lang#129155. Fixes rust-lang#126334.
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129187 - jieyouxu:squeaky-clean-windows-symlinks, r=Kobzol bootstrap: fix clean's remove_dir_all implementation It turns out bootstrap's `clean.rs`'s hand-rolled `rm_rf` (which probably comes before `std::fs::remove_dir_all` was stable) is very broken on native Windows around both read-only files/directories and especially symbolic links. So instead of rolling our own, just use `std::fs::remove_dir_all`. This is a blocker for compiletest's own `rm_rf` implementation rust-lang#129155 which happens to be also buggy, which in turn is a blocker for the rmake.rs test port rust-lang#128562 that heavily exercises symlinks (I was reviewing rust-lang#128562 and testing it on native Windows which is how I found out). I also left a FIXME for `detect_src_and_out` due to a failing assertion on native Windows (opened rust-lang#129188): ``` ---- core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out stdout ---- thread 'core::config::tests::detect_src_and_out' panicked at src\core\config\tests.rs:72:13: assertion `left == right` failed left: "E:\\tmp" right: "C:\\tmp" ``` Fixes rust-lang#112544 (because now we handle Windows symlinks properly). try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: i686-mingw try-job: test-various try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: aarch64-gnu
jieyouxu
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
The symlink troubles observed previously should be related to admin ownership of artifacts when running in non-admin mode, which is not a blocker for this PR. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #131917) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
Opened #134656 for the |
|
Ok it turns out I copied over and fixed up the lto bitcode test in #131917 already. |
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 26, 2024
…-component, r=wesleywiser Migrate `incr-add-rust-src-component` to rmake This PR partially supersedes rust-lang#128562, and ports the Makefile-based `tests/run-make/incr-add-rust-src-component` to use rmake.rs infra. Part of rust-lang#121876. This run-make test is a regression test for rust-lang#70924. It (tries to) checks that if we add the `rust-src` component in between two incremental compiles, that the compiler doesn't ICE on the second invocation. - Original issue:rust-lang#70924 - Fix PR: rust-lang#72767 - PR adding this regression test: rust-lang#72952 However, the Makefile version of this used `$SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/src/libstd/lib.rs`, but that actually got moved around and reorganized over the years. As of Dec 2024, the `rust-src` component is more like (specific for our purposes): ``` $SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/ library/std/src/lib.rs src/ ``` However, this run-make test is ancient and it exercises incr-comp system logic. I'm not sure if this test would actually catch the original regression. This PR was co-authored with `@Oneirical.` r? incremental try-job: i686-msvc try-job: x86_64-mingw-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: aarch64-apple
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 26, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134656 - jieyouxu:migrate-incr-add-rust-src-component, r=wesleywiser Migrate `incr-add-rust-src-component` to rmake This PR partially supersedes rust-lang#128562, and ports the Makefile-based `tests/run-make/incr-add-rust-src-component` to use rmake.rs infra. Part of rust-lang#121876. This run-make test is a regression test for rust-lang#70924. It (tries to) checks that if we add the `rust-src` component in between two incremental compiles, that the compiler doesn't ICE on the second invocation. - Original issue:rust-lang#70924 - Fix PR: rust-lang#72767 - PR adding this regression test: rust-lang#72952 However, the Makefile version of this used `$SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/src/libstd/lib.rs`, but that actually got moved around and reorganized over the years. As of Dec 2024, the `rust-src` component is more like (specific for our purposes): ``` $SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/ library/std/src/lib.rs src/ ``` However, this run-make test is ancient and it exercises incr-comp system logic. I'm not sure if this test would actually catch the original regression. This PR was co-authored with `@Oneirical.` r? incremental try-job: i686-msvc try-job: x86_64-mingw-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: aarch64-apple
poliorcetics
pushed a commit
to poliorcetics/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2024
…-component, r=wesleywiser Migrate `incr-add-rust-src-component` to rmake This PR partially supersedes rust-lang#128562, and ports the Makefile-based `tests/run-make/incr-add-rust-src-component` to use rmake.rs infra. Part of rust-lang#121876. This run-make test is a regression test for rust-lang#70924. It (tries to) checks that if we add the `rust-src` component in between two incremental compiles, that the compiler doesn't ICE on the second invocation. - Original issue:rust-lang#70924 - Fix PR: rust-lang#72767 - PR adding this regression test: rust-lang#72952 However, the Makefile version of this used `$SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/src/libstd/lib.rs`, but that actually got moved around and reorganized over the years. As of Dec 2024, the `rust-src` component is more like (specific for our purposes): ``` $SYSROOT/lib/rustlib/src/rust/ library/std/src/lib.rs src/ ``` However, this run-make test is ancient and it exercises incr-comp system logic. I'm not sure if this test would actually catch the original regression. This PR was co-authored with `@Oneirical.` r? incremental try-job: i686-msvc try-job: x86_64-mingw-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc try-job: aarch64-apple
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #121876 and the associated Google Summer of Code project.
try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
try-job: test-various
try-job: dist-various-1
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: x86_64-mingw
try-job: i686-msvc
try-job: i686-mingw