Skip to content

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines #134894

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol commented Dec 29, 2024

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 29, 2024
@the8472
Copy link
Member

the8472 commented Dec 29, 2024

Thanks.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 29, 2024

📌 Commit 9007cb1 has been approved by the8472

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 29, 2024
Comment on lines 35 to 37
## Local Development

Refer to the [dev guide](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/tests/docker.html) for more information on testing locally.
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu Dec 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may want to move the rustc-dev-guide local development docs here, or maybe move the above workflow docs to rustc-dev-guide lol

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…the8472

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines

r? `@the8472`
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…the8472

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines

r? ``@the8472``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134865 (bootstrap: Don't apply -Ztls-model=initial-exec to deps of proc-macros)
 - rust-lang#134884 (Fix typos)
 - rust-lang#134892 (Added codegen test for elidings bounds check when indexes are manually checked)
 - rust-lang#134894 (Document how to run the split Docker pipelines)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134870 (Fix sentence fragment in `pin` module docs)
 - rust-lang#134884 (Fix typos)
 - rust-lang#134892 (Added codegen test for elidings bounds check when indexes are manually checked)
 - rust-lang#134894 (Document how to run the split Docker pipelines)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e178795 into rust-lang:master Dec 30, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134894 - Kobzol:docker-ci-documentation, r=the8472

Document how to run the split Docker pipelines

r? `@the8472`
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 30, 2024
@Kobzol Kobzol deleted the docker-ci-documentation branch December 30, 2024 08:01
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants