Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

rustbuild: Actually test musl on the musl bot #38498

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2016

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

A typo unfortunately meant that we haven't been testing musl for a bit, so now
it's time to discover if we accidentally introduced a regression!

A typo unfortunately meant that we haven't been testing musl for a bit, so now
it's time to discover if we accidentally introduced a regression!
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Dec 20, 2016

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2016

📌 Commit 49546cc has been approved by brson

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
…brson

rustbuild: Actually test musl on the musl bot

A typo unfortunately meant that we haven't been testing musl for a bit, so now
it's time to discover if we accidentally introduced a regression!
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
@bors bors merged commit 49546cc into rust-lang:master Dec 21, 2016
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the actually-test-musl branch December 27, 2016 06:15
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants