Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

appveyor: Downgrade MinGW to 6.2.0 #40865

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2017
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (#40184) that an
attempted workaround (#40777) does not actually fix (#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.

Closes #40835

It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (rust-lang#40184) that an
attempted workaround (rust-lang#40777) does not actually fix (rust-lang#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (rust-lang#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.

Closes rust-lang#40835
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 27, 2017

Let's see if this works.

@bors r+ p=10

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

📌 Commit e87dd42 has been approved by arielb1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 27, 2017

⌛ Testing commit e87dd42 with merge dda4c6b...

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2017
…elb1

appveyor: Downgrade MinGW to 6.2.0

It looks like the 6.3.0 MinGW comes with a gdb which has issues (rust-lang#40184) that an
attempted workaround (rust-lang#40777) does not actually fix (rust-lang#40835). The original
motivation for upgradin MinGW was to fix build flakiness (rust-lang#40546) due to newer
builds not exhibiting the same bug, so let's hope that 6.2.0 isn't too far back
in time and still contains the fix we need.

Closes rust-lang#40835
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Mar 27, 2017

@bors: retry

  • prioritizing rollup

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2017
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit e87dd42 with merge c552cf3...

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Mar 28, 2017

@bors: retry

  • prioritizing rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 28, 2017

⌛ Testing commit e87dd42 with merge a446d75...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 28, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2017
@bors bors merged commit e87dd42 into rust-lang:master Mar 29, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the downgrade-mingw branch April 4, 2017 23:08
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Debuginfo tests spurious failures on MinGW
5 participants