Skip to content

Make sure rlimit is only ever increased #53229

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 14, 2018
Merged

Conversation

varkor
Copy link
Member

@varkor varkor commented Aug 9, 2018

libc::setrlimit will fail if we try to set the rlimit to a value lower than it is currently, so make sure we're never trying to do this. Fixes #52801.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 9, 2018
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 9, 2018

📌 Commit 82a704a has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 9, 2018
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

(Do we want a test for this? It seems like it'd be a pain...)

@varkor
Copy link
Member Author

varkor commented Aug 9, 2018

Do we want a test for this? It seems like it'd be a pain...

Yeah... that's why there isn't one 😬I was a bit conflicted, but it seemed like an awkward test for a very minor fix.

kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2018
Make sure rlimit is only ever increased

`libc::setrlimit` will fail if we try to set the rlimit to a value lower than it is currently, so make sure we're never trying to do this. Fixes rust-lang#52801.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2018
Make sure rlimit is only ever increased

`libc::setrlimit` will fail if we try to set the rlimit to a value lower than it is currently, so make sure we're never trying to do this. Fixes rust-lang#52801.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2018
Make sure rlimit is only ever increased

`libc::setrlimit` will fail if we try to set the rlimit to a value lower than it is currently, so make sure we're never trying to do this. Fixes rust-lang#52801.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2018
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #53112 (pretty print BTreeSet)
 - #53208 (Don't panic on std::env::vars() when env is null.)
 - #53226 (driver: set the syntax edition in phase 1)
 - #53229 (Make sure rlimit is only ever increased)
 - #53233 (targets: aarch64: Add bare-metal aarch64 target)
 - #53239 (rustc_codegen_llvm: Restore the closure env alloca hack for LLVM 5.)
 - #53246 (A few cleanups)
 - #53257 (Idiomatic improvements to IP method)
 - #53274 (Remove statics field from CodegenCx)
 - #53290 (Make LLVM emit assembly comments with -Z asm-comments)
 - #53317 (Mark prior failure to avoid ICE)
@bors bors merged commit 82a704a into rust-lang:master Aug 14, 2018
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants