Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Mention capping forbid lints #58534

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2019

Conversation

dwijnand
Copy link
Member

I felt the description of forbid was misleading/incomplete without
mentioning how --cap-lints interacts with it.

I felt the description of forbid was misleading/incomplete without
mentioning how --cap-lints interacts with it.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @QuietMisdreavus

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 17, 2019
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Feb 17, 2019

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 17, 2019

📌 Commit 8fbb013 has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 17, 2019
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2019
…ts, r=oli-obk

Mention capping forbid lints

I felt the description of forbid was misleading/incomplete without
mentioning how --cap-lints interacts with it.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
…ts, r=oli-obk

Mention capping forbid lints

I felt the description of forbid was misleading/incomplete without
mentioning how --cap-lints interacts with it.
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
…ts, r=oli-obk

Mention capping forbid lints

I felt the description of forbid was misleading/incomplete without
mentioning how --cap-lints interacts with it.
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
…ts, r=oli-obk

Mention capping forbid lints

I felt the description of forbid was misleading/incomplete without
mentioning how --cap-lints interacts with it.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
Rollup of 24 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #56470 (Modify doctest's auto-`fn main()` to allow `Result`s)
 - #58044 (Make overflowing and wrapping negation const)
 - #58303 (Improve stability tags display)
 - #58336 (Fix search results interactions)
 - #58384 (Fix tables display)
 - #58392 (Use less explicit shifting in std::net::ip)
 - #58409 (rustdoc: respect alternate flag when formatting impl trait)
 - #58456 (Remove no longer accurate diagnostic code about NLL)
 - #58528 (Don't use an allocation for ItemId in StmtKind)
 - #58530 (Monomorphize less code in fs::{read|write})
 - #58534 (Mention capping forbid lints)
 - #58536 (Remove UB in pointer tests)
 - #58538 (Add missing fmt structs examples)
 - #58539 (Add alias methods to PathBuf for underlying OsString (#58234))
 - #58544 (Fix doc for rustc "-g" flag)
 - #58545 (Add regression test for a specialization-related ICE (#39448))
 - #58546 (librustc_codegen_llvm => 2018)
 - #58551 (Explain a panic in test case net::tcp::tests::double_bind)
 - #58553 (Use more impl header lifetime elision)
 - #58562 (Fix style nits)
 - #58565 (Fix typo in std::future::Future docs)
 - #58568 (Fix a transposition in driver.rs.)
 - #58569 (Reduce Some Code Repetitions like `(n << amt) >> amt`)
 - #58576 (Stabilize iter::successors and iter::from_fn)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
Rollup of 24 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #56470 (Modify doctest's auto-`fn main()` to allow `Result`s)
 - #58044 (Make overflowing and wrapping negation const)
 - #58303 (Improve stability tags display)
 - #58336 (Fix search results interactions)
 - #58384 (Fix tables display)
 - #58392 (Use less explicit shifting in std::net::ip)
 - #58409 (rustdoc: respect alternate flag when formatting impl trait)
 - #58456 (Remove no longer accurate diagnostic code about NLL)
 - #58528 (Don't use an allocation for ItemId in StmtKind)
 - #58530 (Monomorphize less code in fs::{read|write})
 - #58534 (Mention capping forbid lints)
 - #58536 (Remove UB in pointer tests)
 - #58538 (Add missing fmt structs examples)
 - #58539 (Add alias methods to PathBuf for underlying OsString (#58234))
 - #58544 (Fix doc for rustc "-g" flag)
 - #58545 (Add regression test for a specialization-related ICE (#39448))
 - #58546 (librustc_codegen_llvm => 2018)
 - #58551 (Explain a panic in test case net::tcp::tests::double_bind)
 - #58553 (Use more impl header lifetime elision)
 - #58562 (Fix style nits)
 - #58565 (Fix typo in std::future::Future docs)
 - #58568 (Fix a transposition in driver.rs.)
 - #58569 (Reduce Some Code Repetitions like `(n << amt) >> amt`)
 - #58576 (Stabilize iter::successors and iter::from_fn)
@bors bors merged commit 8fbb013 into rust-lang:master Feb 20, 2019
@dwijnand dwijnand deleted the mention-capping-forbid-lints branch February 20, 2019 13:12
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants