Skip to content

Clean up E0367 explanation #69394

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2020
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 23, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 23, 2020

📌 Commit 78e4bd1 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 23, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #69372 (Updates links in various Compiler Error Index entries)
 - #69385 (Relax str::get_unchecked precondition to permit empty slicing)
 - #69386 (Fix minor error in `MaybeUninit::get_mut()` doc example)
 - #69394 (Clean up E0367 explanation)
 - #69405 (docs: Stdin::read_line: mention the appending)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 1cfb6c2 into rust-lang:master Feb 24, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the clean-up-0367 branch February 25, 2020 10:17
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants