Skip to content

docs: Stdin::read_line: mention the appending #69405

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 24, 2020

Conversation

meithecatte
Copy link
Contributor

The fact that stdin().read_line() is an unpleasant footgun. Let's make it clearer in the documentation.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @joshtriplett

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 23, 2020
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

Very nice change, thank you!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 24, 2020

📌 Commit b3e0d27 has been approved by joshtriplett

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 24, 2020
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #69372 (Updates links in various Compiler Error Index entries)
 - #69385 (Relax str::get_unchecked precondition to permit empty slicing)
 - #69386 (Fix minor error in `MaybeUninit::get_mut()` doc example)
 - #69394 (Clean up E0367 explanation)
 - #69405 (docs: Stdin::read_line: mention the appending)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit ba3fee6 into rust-lang:master Feb 24, 2020
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants