Skip to content

rustc: Modernize wasm checks for atomics #73665

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2020

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit modernizes how rustc checks for whether the atomics
feature is enabled for the wasm target. The sess.target_features set
is consulted instead of fiddling around with dealing with various
aspects of LLVM and that syntax.

This commit modernizes how rustc checks for whether the `atomics`
feature is enabled for the wasm target. The `sess.target_features` set
is consulted instead of fiddling around with dealing with various
aspects of LLVM and that syntax.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @davidtwco

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 23, 2020
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 23, 2020

📌 Commit 0c2b025 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 23, 2020
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2020
…ature, r=davidtwco

rustc: Modernize wasm checks for atomics

This commit modernizes how rustc checks for whether the `atomics`
feature is enabled for the wasm target. The `sess.target_features` set
is consulted instead of fiddling around with dealing with various
aspects of LLVM and that syntax.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2020
…arth

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#72780 (Enforce doc alias check)
 - rust-lang#72876 (Mention that BTreeMap::new() doesn't allocate)
 - rust-lang#73244 (Check for assignments between non-conflicting generator saved locals)
 - rust-lang#73488 (code coverage foundation for hash and num_counters)
 - rust-lang#73523 (Fix -Z unpretty=everybody_loops)
 - rust-lang#73587 (Move remaining `NodeId` APIs from `Definitions` to `Resolver`)
 - rust-lang#73601 (Point at the call span when overflow occurs during monomorphization)
 - rust-lang#73613 (The const propagator cannot trace references.)
 - rust-lang#73614 (fix `intrinsics::needs_drop` docs)
 - rust-lang#73630 (Provide context on E0308 involving fn items)
 - rust-lang#73665 (rustc: Modernize wasm checks for atomics)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 6ed6a84 into rust-lang:master Jun 24, 2020
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the update-wasm-atomics-feature branch July 23, 2020 21:21
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.46 milestone May 2, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants