Skip to content

Don't count variants/fields/consts/associated types in doc-coverage doc examples #75718

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 22, 2020

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez commented Aug 19, 2020

Fixes #75714.

I think I'll need to update the equivalent lint too. Creating an issue for that!

r? @jyn514

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 19, 2020
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Aug 19, 2020

You linked to the wrong issue, I think you meant #75714.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

I've been failing to reference the correct issue a lot lately. I think something is wrong with my copy/paste skill...

@jyn514 jyn514 changed the title Coverage ui doc examples count Don't count variants/fields/consts/associated types in doc-coverage doc examples Aug 19, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez force-pushed the coverage-ui-doc-examples-count branch from d16ee60 to d108bd5 Compare August 20, 2020 19:27
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Updated!

Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me once nit is fixed

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=jyn514

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 21, 2020

📌 Commit 10a880d has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 21, 2020
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, so with the nit fixed, we can r+!

@bors: r=jyn514

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 21, 2020

📌 Commit adeedf5 has been approved by jyn514

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2020
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#75705 (Move to intra-doc links for /library/core/src/intrinsics.rs)
 - rust-lang#75711 (Split `astconv.rs` into its own submodule)
 - rust-lang#75718 (Don't count variants/fields/consts/associated types in doc-coverage doc examples)
 - rust-lang#75725 (Use intra-doc-links in `alloc`)
 - rust-lang#75745 (Remove duplication in `fold_item`)
 - rust-lang#75753 (Another motivation for CFG: return-oriented programming)
 - rust-lang#75769 (Minor, remove double nesting of a test module)
 - rust-lang#75771 (Extend normalization in const-eval-query-stack test)
 - rust-lang#75781 (More inline asm register name fixups for LLVM)
 - rust-lang#75782 (Convert core/src/str/pattern.rs to Intra-doc links)
 - rust-lang#75787 (Use intra-doc-links in `core::ops::*`)
 - rust-lang#75788 (MIR call terminator represents diverging calls too)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#75773 (Introduce expect snapshot testing library into rustc)

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 441c835 into rust-lang:master Aug 22, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2020
…int-improvements, r=jyn514

Missing doc examples lint improvements

Fixes rust-lang#75719.

To be merged after rust-lang#75718 (only the two last commits are from this PR).

Since you already reviewed rust-lang#75718, I'll set you as reviewer here as well. :)

r? @jyn514
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the coverage-ui-doc-examples-count branch August 22, 2020 09:26
@jyn514 jyn514 added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Oct 1, 2020
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.47.0 milestone May 2, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Don't count variants/fields/consts/associated types in doc-coverage doc examples
5 participants