Skip to content

Workaround for "could not fully normalize" ICE #78854

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged

Conversation

the8472
Copy link
Member

@the8472 the8472 commented Nov 7, 2020

Workaround for "could not fully normalize" ICE (#78139) by removing the needs_drop::<T>() calls triggering it.
Corresponding beta PR: #78845

Fixes #78139 -- the underlying bug is likely not fixed but we don't have another test case isolated for now, so closing.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 7, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 7, 2020

📌 Commit 8c7046e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 7, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. and removed beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. labels Nov 7, 2020
@jplatte
Copy link
Contributor

jplatte commented Nov 9, 2020

I provided a MCVE that relies on feature(const_evaluatable_checked) in #78139 (comment), although it only works with two crates involved. Could that somehow be integrated as a regression test (if it is fixed by this)?

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
…as-schievink

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#76765 (Make it more clear what an about async fn's returns when referring to what it returns)
 - rust-lang#78574 (Use check-pass instead of build-pass in regions ui test suite)
 - rust-lang#78669 (Use check-pass instead of build-pass in some consts ui test suits)
 - rust-lang#78847 (Assert that a return place is not used for indexing during integration)
 - rust-lang#78854 (Workaround for "could not fully normalize" ICE )
 - rust-lang#78875 (rustc_target: Further cleanup use of target options)
 - rust-lang#78887 (Add comments to explain memory usage optimization)
 - rust-lang#78890 (comment attribution fix)
 - rust-lang#78896 (Clarified description of write! macro)
 - rust-lang#78897 (Add missing newline to error message of the default OOM hook)
 - rust-lang#78898 (add regression test for rust-lang#78892)
 - rust-lang#78908 ((rustdoc) [src] link for types defined by macros shows invocation, not defintion)
 - rust-lang#78910 (Fix links to stabilized versions of some intrinsics)
 - rust-lang#78912 (Add macro test for min-const-generics)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit e15fee9 into rust-lang:master Nov 11, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.49.0 milestone Nov 11, 2020
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
beta-accepted Accepted for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

regression: could not fully normalize type
6 participants