Skip to content

Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments #79177

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2020

Conversation

fanzier
Copy link
Contributor

@fanzier fanzier commented Nov 18, 2020

Add a test that checks whether the drop order of let bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.

Thanks to @RalfJung for the suggesting this test (here) and an implementation!

r? @RalfJung

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 18, 2020
@jyn514 jyn514 added the A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc label Nov 18, 2020
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 19, 2020

📌 Commit 1094f97 has been approved by RalfJung

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 19, 2020
@varkor varkor added the F-destructuring_assignment `#![feature(destructuring_assignment)]` label Nov 19, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments

Add a test that checks whether the drop order of `let` bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.

Thanks to `@RalfJung` for the suggesting this test ([here](rust-lang#79016 (comment))) and an implementation!

r? `@RalfJung`
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2020
Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments

Add a test that checks whether the drop order of `let` bindings is consistent with the drop order of the corresponding destructuring assignments.

Thanks to ``@RalfJung`` for the suggesting this test ([here](rust-lang#79016 (comment))) and an implementation!

r? ``@RalfJung``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79119 (Clarify availability of atomic operations)
 - rust-lang#79123 (Add u128 and i128 integer tests)
 - rust-lang#79177 (Test drop order for (destructuring) assignments)
 - rust-lang#79181 (rustdoc: add [src] links to methods on a trait's page)
 - rust-lang#79183 (Make compiletest testing use the local sysroot)
 - rust-lang#79185 (expand/resolve: Pre-requisites to "Turn `#[derive]` into a regular macro attribute")
 - rust-lang#79193 (Revert rust-lang#78969 "Normalize function type during validation")
 - rust-lang#79194 (Make as{_mut,}_slice on array::IntoIter public)
 - rust-lang#79204 (Add jyn514 email alias to mailmap)
 - rust-lang#79212 (Move `rustc_ty` -> `rustc_ty_utils`)
 - rust-lang#79217 (Add the "memcpy" doc alias to slice::copy_from_slice)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit acc2e23 into rust-lang:master Nov 20, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 20, 2020
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc F-destructuring_assignment `#![feature(destructuring_assignment)]` S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants