Skip to content

Remove dead code from compiletest::json #89993

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2021
Merged

Conversation

pierwill
Copy link
Member

@pierwill pierwill commented Oct 17, 2021

Currently getting a dead code warning on master. Might make sense to remove.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 17, 2021
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Are you compiling with a custom bootstrap compiler? I would have expected the warning to be caught in CI...

@pierwill
Copy link
Member Author

pierwill commented Oct 18, 2021

This came up when doing rustc dev work, so probably yes.

@pierwill
Copy link
Member Author

With current nightly:

cd src/tools/compiletest
cargo c
    Checking compiletest v0.0.0 (repos/rust/src/tools/compiletest)
warning: field is never read: `explanation`
  --> src/tools/compiletest/src/json.rs:78:5
   |
78 |     explanation: Option<String>,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default

warning: `compiletest` (bin "compiletest") generated 1 warning
    Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 27.81s

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Oh, it's not generally expected that you'd try to build tools by hand like that -- we only verify building against the beta compiler in src/stage0.json, which is automatically provisioned by x.py for you.

I'll r+ this in the meantime, though, since it seems like a nice cleanup regardless.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 18, 2021

📌 Commit b87a0b0 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 18, 2021
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#89950 (bootstrap: tweak verbosity settings)
 - rust-lang#89965 (Fix ICE with `let...else` and `ref mut`)
 - rust-lang#89974 (Nicer error message if the user attempts to do let...else if)
 - rust-lang#89987 (Check implementing type for `#[doc(hidden)]`)
 - rust-lang#89989 (rustdoc: Add static size assertion for `clean::Type`)
 - rust-lang#89990 (rustc_span: `Ident::invalid` -> `Ident::empty`)
 - rust-lang#89993 (Remove dead code from `compiletest::json`)
 - rust-lang#89996 (Bump backtrace)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit adde016 into rust-lang:master Oct 18, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Oct 18, 2021
@pierwill pierwill deleted the patch-1 branch October 19, 2021 14:31
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants