Skip to content

Rollup of 6 pull requests #90661

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 7, 2021
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #90661

merged 12 commits into from
Nov 7, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

nbdd0121 and others added 12 commits November 2, 2021 17:22
The adjustments are used later by ExprUseVisitor to build Place projections
and without adjustments it can produce invalid result.
Includes documentation for:
 - general page structure
 - navigation
 - searching
 - themes
 - deep-linking

Doesn't include docs on the settings page.
For example:

    enum Ty {
        Unit,
        List(Box<Ty>),
    }

    fn foo(x: Ty) -> Ty {
        match x {
            Ty::Unit => Ty::Unit,
            Ty::List(elem) => foo(elem),
        }
    }

Before, the only suggestion was to rewrap `elem` with `Ty::List`,
which is unhelpful and confusing:

    error[E0308]: mismatched types
     --> src/test/ui/suggestions/boxed-variant-field.rs:9:31
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(elem),
      |                               ^^^^
      |                               |
      |                               expected enum `Ty`, found struct `Box`
      |                               help: try using a variant of the expected enum: `Ty::List(elem)`
      |
      = note: expected enum `Ty`
               found struct `Box<Ty>`

Now, rustc will first suggest dereferencing the `Box`, which is most
likely what the user intended:

    error[E0308]: mismatched types
     --> src/test/ui/suggestions/boxed-variant-field.rs:9:31
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(elem),
      |                               ^^^^ expected enum `Ty`, found struct `Box`
      |
      = note: expected enum `Ty`
               found struct `Box<Ty>`
    help: try dereferencing the `Box`
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(*elem),
      |                               +
    help: try using a variant of the expected enum
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(Ty::List(elem)),
      |                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
… r=jyn514

Add a chapter on reading Rustdoc output

Includes documentation for:
 - general page structure
 - navigation
 - searching
 - themes
 - deep-linking

Doesn't include docs on the settings page.

Per rust-lang#90309
Apply adjustments for field expression even if inaccessible

The adjustments are used later by ExprUseVisitor to build Place projections and without adjustments it can produce invalid result.

Fix rust-lang#90483

``@rustbot`` label: T-compiler
Suggest dereference of `Box` when inner type is expected

For example:

    enum Ty {
        Unit,
        List(Box<Ty>),
    }

    fn foo(x: Ty) -> Ty {
        match x {
            Ty::Unit => Ty::Unit,
            Ty::List(elem) => foo(elem),
        }
    }

Before, the only suggestion was to rewrap `inner` with `Ty::Wrapper`,
which is unhelpful and confusing:

    error[E0308]: mismatched types
     --> src/test/ui/suggestions/boxed-variant-field.rs:9:31
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(elem),
      |                               ^^^^
      |                               |
      |                               expected enum `Ty`, found struct `Box`
      |                               help: try using a variant of the expected enum: `Ty::List(elem)`
      |
      = note: expected enum `Ty`
               found struct `Box<Ty>`

Now, rustc will first suggest dereferencing the `Box`, which is most
likely what the user intended:

    error[E0308]: mismatched types
     --> src/test/ui/suggestions/boxed-variant-field.rs:9:31
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(elem),
      |                               ^^^^ expected enum `Ty`, found struct `Box`
      |
      = note: expected enum `Ty`
               found struct `Box<Ty>`
    help: try dereferencing the `Box`
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(*elem),
      |                               +
    help: try using a variant of the expected enum
      |
    9 |         Ty::List(elem) => foo(Ty::List(elem)),
      |                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

r? ``@davidtwco``
…llot

use matches!() macro in more places
type error go brrrrrrrr

Fixes rust-lang#90444

when we relate something like:
`fn(fn((), (), u32))` with `fn(fn((), (), ()))`
we relate the inner fn ptrs:
`fn((), (), u32)` with `fn((), (), ())`
yielding a `TypeError::ArgumentSorts(_, 2)` which we then use as the `TypeError` for the `fn(fn(..))` which later causes the ICE as the `2` does not correspond to any input or output types in `fn(_)`

r? `@estebank`
Run reveal_all on MIR when inlining is activated.

Fix logic error in rust-lang#85254 which prevented the pass from running when needed.
Fixes rust-lang#78442
r? ``@lcnr``
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Nov 6, 2021
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 6, 2021

📌 Commit ec471de has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Nov 6, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 6, 2021

⌛ Testing commit ec471de with merge 089a016...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 7, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 089a016 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 7, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 089a016 into rust-lang:master Nov 7, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 7, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (089a016): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-1umbdlx branch November 20, 2021 15:03
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants