Skip to content

Suggest returning tail expressions in async functions #92381

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2022

Conversation

ThePuzzlemaker
Copy link
Contributor

@ThePuzzlemaker ThePuzzlemaker commented Dec 29, 2021

This PR fixes #92308.

Previously, the suggestion to return tail expressions (introduced in #81769) did not apply to async functions, as the suggestion checked whether the types were equal disregarding impl Future<Output = T> syntax sugar for async functions. This PR changes that in order to fix a potential papercut.

I'm not sure if this is the "right" way to do this, so if there is a better way then please let me know.

I amended an existing test introduced in #81769 to add a regression test for this, if you think I should make a separate test I will.

This amends off of an existing test introduced in rust-lang#81769, if you think I
should make a separate test I will.
@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 29, 2021
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @estebank

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 29, 2021
@estebank
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 10, 2022

📌 Commit ab7c446 has been approved by estebank

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 10, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92045 (Don't fall back to crate-level opaque type definitions.)
 - rust-lang#92381 (Suggest `return`ing tail expressions in async functions)
 - rust-lang#92768 (Partially stabilize `maybe_uninit_extra`)
 - rust-lang#92810 (Deduplicate box deref and regular deref suggestions)
 - rust-lang#92818 (Update documentation for doc_cfg feature)
 - rust-lang#92840 (Fix some lints documentation)
 - rust-lang#92849 (Clippyup)
 - rust-lang#92854 (Use the updated Rust logo in rustdoc)
 - rust-lang#92864 (Fix a missing dot in the main item heading)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#92838 (Clean up some links in RELEASES)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 347c744 into rust-lang:master Jan 14, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Jan 14, 2022
@ThePuzzlemaker ThePuzzlemaker deleted the issue-92308 branch March 20, 2022 21:12
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better error message for missing return in async fns
5 participants