Add script to prevent point releases with same number as existing ones #93128
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
pietroalbini
added
beta-accepted
|
Marking this for beta backport to ensure we have this protection from 1.59.0 onwards. |
|
This looks good to me. @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 855c176 has been approved by |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#91032 (Introduce drop range tracking to generator interior analysis) - rust-lang#92856 (Exclude "test" from doc_auto_cfg) - rust-lang#92860 (Fix errors on blanket impls by ignoring the children of generated impls) - rust-lang#93038 (Fix star handling in block doc comments) - rust-lang#93061 (Only suggest adding `!` to expressions that can be macro invocation) - rust-lang#93067 (rustdoc mobile: fix scroll offset when jumping to internal id) - rust-lang#93086 (Add tests to ensure that `let_chains` works with `if_let_guard`) - rust-lang#93087 (Fix src/test/run-make/raw-dylib-alt-calling-convention) - rust-lang#93091 (⬆ chalk to 0.76.0) - rust-lang#93094 (src/test/rustdoc-json: Check for `struct_field`s in `variant_tuple_struct.rs`) - rust-lang#93098 (Show a more informative panic message when `DefPathHash` does not exist) - rust-lang#93099 (rustdoc: auto create output directory when "--output-format json") - rust-lang#93102 (Pretty printer algorithm revamp step 3) - rust-lang#93104 (Support --bless for pp-exact pretty printer tests) - rust-lang#93114 (update comment for `ensure_monomorphic_enough`) - rust-lang#93128 (Add script to prevent point releases with same number as existing ones) - rust-lang#93136 (Backport the 1.58.1 release notes to master) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
ehuss
pushed a commit
to ehuss/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2022
…on-number, r=Mark-Simulacrum Add script to prevent point releases with same number as existing ones This will hopefully prevent what happened today with rust-lang#93110 and rust-lang#93121, where we built point release artifacts without changing version numbers, thus requiring another PR to change the version number. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Merged
ehuss
removed
the
beta-nominated
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2022
[beta] Backports
* Update cargo
* rust-lang/cargo#10328 — remove --host flag
* rust-lang/cargo#10325 — Fix documenting with undocumented dependencies
* rust-lang#93128 — Add script to prevent point releases with same number as existing ones
* rust-lang#93014 — Revert "Do not hash leading zero bytes of i64 numbers in Sip128 hasher"
* rust-lang#93012 — Update pulldown-cmark version to fix markdown list issue
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will hopefully prevent what happened today with #93110 and #93121, where we built point release artifacts without changing version numbers, thus requiring another PR to change the version number.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum