-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Allow using stable os::fd::raw items through unstable os::wasi module #99723
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams! If this PR contains changes to any Examples of
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
Can you add a test for this? |
r=me once the test is added |
I'm happy to add a test, but I don't know where in the test suite it would live. I don't really want a unit test, because it will be ruined if anyone ever adds |
I've added a test to ensure these items are available on stable. I didn't add them to the existing accidentally-stable-in-unstable test because these items are specific to the the wasm32-wasi target and I didn't want to force that entire test to be built for wasm32-wasi, so I created a new test, accidentally-stable-in-unstable-wasi. This also required teaching compiletest a little about the wasm32-wasi target, which I did in a separate commit. |
There's some question on Zulip as to whether or not the test that I've added will actually be run in practice. Since I had to modify compiletest to get this test to run, I assume that it's not currently set up to run any wasm32-wasi tests (even check-pass tests like this one). So should I remove the test? Should I leave it, and expect it to never get run? Should I find a way to get the test to run during CI (which might be a bit of a large project, I'd like to get this regression fixed before the next beta is cut...)? |
This fixes a regression from stable to nightly. Closes rust-lang#99502.
I've removed the test, since @yaahc indicated on Zulip that she's fine with not adding a test for this. I'm happy to open a follow-up issue to track adding a test for this if anyone thinks that's necessary. |
@bors r+ |
Allow using stable os::fd::raw items through unstable os::wasi module This fixes a regression from stable to nightly. Closes rust-lang#99502.
Allow using stable os::fd::raw items through unstable os::wasi module This fixes a regression from stable to nightly. Closes rust-lang#99502.
Allow using stable os::fd::raw items through unstable os::wasi module This fixes a regression from stable to nightly. Closes rust-lang#99502.
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#99714 (Fix regression introduced with rust-lang#99383) - rust-lang#99723 (Allow using stable os::fd::raw items through unstable os::wasi module) - rust-lang#99810 (Fix settings slider on small width screens) - rust-lang#99837 (Avoid `Symbol` to `String` conversions) - rust-lang#99846 (Refactor `UnresolvedImportError`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
…_through_unstable_modules, r=Mark-Simulacrum Remove dead rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules for std::os::fd contents As far as I was able to reconstruct, the history here is roughly as follows: - rust-lang#99723 added some `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` to the types in `std::os::fd::raw` since they were accessible on stable via the unstable `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` path. (This was needed to fix rust-lang#99502.) - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#98368 re-organized things so that instead of re-exporting from an internal `std::os::wasi::io::raw`, `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` is now directly re-exported from `std::os::fd`. This also made `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` entirely dead code as far as I can tell, it's not imported by anything any more. - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#103308 stabilizes `std::os::wasi::io`, so `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` is not needed any more to access `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd`. There is even a comment in `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` saying the attribute can be removed now, but that file is dead code so it is not touched as part of the stabilization. I did a grep for `pub use crate::os::fd` and all the re-exports I could find are in stable modules. So given all that, we can remove the `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` (hoping they are not also re-exported somewhere else, it's really hard to be sure about this). I have checked that std still builds after this PR on the wasm32-wasip2 target.
…_through_unstable_modules, r=Mark-Simulacrum Remove dead rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules for std::os::fd contents As far as I was able to reconstruct, the history here is roughly as follows: - rust-lang#99723 added some `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` to the types in `std::os::fd::raw` since they were accessible on stable via the unstable `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` path. (This was needed to fix rust-lang#99502.) - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#98368 re-organized things so that instead of re-exporting from an internal `std::os::wasi::io::raw`, `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` is now directly re-exported from `std::os::fd`. This also made `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` entirely dead code as far as I can tell, it's not imported by anything any more. - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#103308 stabilizes `std::os::wasi::io`, so `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` is not needed any more to access `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd`. There is even a comment in `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` saying the attribute can be removed now, but that file is dead code so it is not touched as part of the stabilization. I did a grep for `pub use crate::os::fd` and all the re-exports I could find are in stable modules. So given all that, we can remove the `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` (hoping they are not also re-exported somewhere else, it's really hard to be sure about this). I have checked that std still builds after this PR on the wasm32-wasip2 target.
…_through_unstable_modules, r=Mark-Simulacrum Remove dead rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules for std::os::fd contents As far as I was able to reconstruct, the history here is roughly as follows: - rust-lang#99723 added some `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` to the types in `std::os::fd::raw` since they were accessible on stable via the unstable `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` path. (This was needed to fix rust-lang#99502.) - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#98368 re-organized things so that instead of re-exporting from an internal `std::os::wasi::io::raw`, `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` is now directly re-exported from `std::os::fd`. This also made `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` entirely dead code as far as I can tell, it's not imported by anything any more. - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#103308 stabilizes `std::os::wasi::io`, so `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` is not needed any more to access `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd`. There is even a comment in `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` saying the attribute can be removed now, but that file is dead code so it is not touched as part of the stabilization. I did a grep for `pub use crate::os::fd` and all the re-exports I could find are in stable modules. So given all that, we can remove the `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` (hoping they are not also re-exported somewhere else, it's really hard to be sure about this). I have checked that std still builds after this PR on the wasm32-wasip2 target.
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135491 - RalfJung:remove-dead-rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules, r=Mark-Simulacrum Remove dead rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules for std::os::fd contents As far as I was able to reconstruct, the history here is roughly as follows: - rust-lang#99723 added some `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` to the types in `std::os::fd::raw` since they were accessible on stable via the unstable `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` path. (This was needed to fix rust-lang#99502.) - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#98368 re-organized things so that instead of re-exporting from an internal `std::os::wasi::io::raw`, `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` is now directly re-exported from `std::os::fd`. This also made `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` entirely dead code as far as I can tell, it's not imported by anything any more. - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#103308 stabilizes `std::os::wasi::io`, so `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` is not needed any more to access `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd`. There is even a comment in `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` saying the attribute can be removed now, but that file is dead code so it is not touched as part of the stabilization. I did a grep for `pub use crate::os::fd` and all the re-exports I could find are in stable modules. So given all that, we can remove the `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` (hoping they are not also re-exported somewhere else, it's really hard to be sure about this). I have checked that std still builds after this PR on the wasm32-wasip2 target.
…_through_unstable_modules, r=Mark-Simulacrum Remove dead rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules for std::os::fd contents As far as I was able to reconstruct, the history here is roughly as follows: - rust-lang#99723 added some `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` to the types in `std::os::fd::raw` since they were accessible on stable via the unstable `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` path. (This was needed to fix rust-lang#99502.) - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#98368 re-organized things so that instead of re-exporting from an internal `std::os::wasi::io::raw`, `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd` is now directly re-exported from `std::os::fd`. This also made `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` entirely dead code as far as I can tell, it's not imported by anything any more. - Shortly thereafter, rust-lang#103308 stabilizes `std::os::wasi::io`, so `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` is not needed any more to access `std::os::wasi::io::AsRawFd`. There is even a comment in `library/std/src/os/wasi/io/raw.rs` saying the attribute can be removed now, but that file is dead code so it is not touched as part of the stabilization. I did a grep for `pub use crate::os::fd` and all the re-exports I could find are in stable modules. So given all that, we can remove the `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` (hoping they are not also re-exported somewhere else, it's really hard to be sure about this). I have checked that std still builds after this PR on the wasm32-wasip2 target.
This fixes a regression from stable to nightly.
Closes #99502.