Don't re-balance AndTypes arising from supertypes #20400
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
scala#20284 started breaking since we now balance AndTypes to avoid performance drops. But (re-)balancing an AndType interferes with the logic that determines which symbol is referred by a super select. This is fixed by two changes: - Form types of super with `AndType` instead of `&` - Don't simplify types of super since that would rebalance the underlying AndTypes. Fixes scala#20284
EugeneFlesselle
approved these changes
May 25, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That was not an obvious consequence of rebalancing the AndTypes at all !
I've noticed we also rebalance the parents of a ClassInfo for the classBound used in the AvoidMap, I'm not sure if it could also have some an unexpected effects ?
scala3/compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/TypeOps.scala
Lines 407 to 409 in 7bdeb0b
|
|
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#20284 started breaking since we now balance AndTypes to avoid performance drops. But (re-)balancing an AndType interferes with the logic that determines which symbol is referred by a super select. This is fixed by two changes:
AndTypeinstead of&Fixes #20284