You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[^1]:
I have a funny story about this that I am not quite prepared to tell at
the moment but want to tell someday.
which is rendered as an empty footnotes and places an unwanted paragraph in the main text.
I would be able to work around this bug by simply allowing long-lined footnotes if I only had simple footnotes, but unfortunately more complicated footnotes, like this one from the footnote documentation above, are always mangled by rewrap.
[^bignote]: Here's one with multiple paragraphs and code.
Indent paragraphs to include them in the footnote.
`{ my code }`
Add as many paragraphs as you like.
Would it be possible to add support for long footnotes and fix this bug? Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing as duplicate of #63. I did try to fix it but found I basically had to rewrite the markdown parser to fix that (and other) bugs, which is still a WIP
- New architecture (still WIP) with performance increase.
- Markdown: new parser that fixes many small bugs (inc #288), as well as
supporting:
- Front matter header (#277, #294)
- Link reference definitions (#63, #93)
- Footnotes (#188)
- ReStructuredText support (standalone & for Python, almost complete)
(#88).
- Julia: support `#= ... =#` block comments (#302)
- Visual Studio: Wrap to rulers generated from .editorconfig by the
Editor Guidelines extension (thereby indirectly supporting
.editorconfig) (#300).
Currently, an overlong footnote like so:
is not rewrapped, violating an 80 character limit. Manually rewrapping to
which follows guidelines for long footnotes, is incorrectly rewrapped to
which is rendered as an empty footnotes and places an unwanted paragraph in the main text.
I would be able to work around this bug by simply allowing long-lined footnotes if I only had simple footnotes, but unfortunately more complicated footnotes, like this one from the footnote documentation above, are always mangled by rewrap.
Would it be possible to add support for long footnotes and fix this bug? Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: