-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Introduce unique annotation #273
Merged
flyingsilverfin
merged 13 commits into
typedb:master
from
krishnangovindraj:unique-annotation
May 3, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
746d8e3
First pass at generalised annotations
flyingsilverfin 42c8881
Add more example
flyingsilverfin 7deb706
Update Builders
flyingsilverfin 52cae0d
Refactor into agreed-upon rule format
flyingsilverfin c55f41b
Turn annotations to list; Add ParserTest
krishnangovindraj 4da7c30
Reintroduce TypeConstraint.isOwns method
krishnangovindraj 04a8eb7
TypeConstraint.Owns::uniqueness returns Optional<Annotation>
krishnangovindraj f9ee0ab
Remove OwnsConstraint.uniqueness
krishnangovindraj c481283
Simplify API to use Annotation... consistently
flyingsilverfin 07cc2be
Fix toString, exception, and optimisation
flyingsilverfin 280b65c
Fix and optimise annotation parsing
flyingsilverfin 86b0fe9
Update string printer
flyingsilverfin ec17bdf
Refactor Owns printer
flyingsilverfin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@krishnangovindraj raised good point about order indendence:
note that now each one is optional independently and the rule is written in singular form.