Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add feature to disable SSL verification on Swarm clients #117

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Add feature to disable SSL verification on Swarm clients #117

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

nickchappell
Copy link

This feature adds a parameter to the jenkins::slave class to control whether Swarm clients will verify the SSL cert of a Jenkins master, if the Jenkins master URL the client is using is HTTPS. For safety's sake, the default value is set to false.

…ck its value and set the disable_ssl_verification_flag variable accordingly. If the parameter is set to 'true', the -disableSslVerification is added to the init script template's start command.
…x:/var/git/puppet/office_modules/jenkins into feature/disable-swarm-ssl-verification-flag
@jenkinsadmin
Copy link

Thank you for a pull request! Please check this document for how the Jenkins project handles pull requests

@rtyler
Copy link

rtyler commented Mar 30, 2014

We have two steps forward for this pull requests, either you can add some rspec-puppet tests for it @nickchappell or you can wait for me to get around to it (probably a week or two, since I've already squandered my weekend :))

@nickchappell
Copy link
Author

Unfortunately, your time frame is probably better than mine. I won't have any time in the foreseeable future to add rspec tests. :(

@rtyler
Copy link

rtyler commented Apr 2, 2014

I'll add this to the next release after "this one" to get done then, hold on tight :)

@nickchappell
Copy link
Author

Closing this, as #122 was merged.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants