Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2018. It is now read-only.

Update swagger-client to version 2.1.24 🚀 #40

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

swagger-client just published its new version 2.1.24.

State Update 🚀
Dependency swagger-client
New version 2.1.24
Type dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of swagger-client.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

Minor update to swagger-js which allows:

  • Custom http agents #884
  • Custom http clients #889
  • Cookie options #891
  • Sourcemaps #900

The new version differs by 86 commits .

There are 86 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@zeropaper zeropaper force-pushed the greenkeeper-swagger-client-2.1.24 branch from bf6f526 to 2d0f9fa Compare December 21, 2016 16:30
@zeropaper zeropaper force-pushed the greenkeeper-swagger-client-2.1.24 branch from 2d0f9fa to 8e0d0f0 Compare December 21, 2016 16:31
@zeropaper zeropaper closed this Dec 21, 2016
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants