-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
lightning: adjust TS assertion range between TiDB and PD #58594
Conversation
Welcome @takaebato! |
Hi @takaebato. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Hi @takaebato. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
/cc @D3Hunter |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #58594 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 73.5142% 73.9256% +0.4114%
================================================
Files 1680 1710 +30
Lines 464725 474869 +10144
================================================
+ Hits 341639 351050 +9411
- Misses 102218 102274 +56
- Partials 20868 21545 +677
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: D3Hunter, lance6716 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #58449
Problem Summary:
Timestamp assertion was flaky due to minor clock drift between TiDB and PD.
What changed and how does it work?
Expanded the range to tolerate minor differences, allowing timestamps up to 1 hour in the future and 24 hours in the past.
Check List
Tests
I’d greatly appreciate it if you could suggest a good place to add tests, if needed!
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.