Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

icub2_5: Add alljoints-inertials_wrapper/remapper #264

Merged

Conversation

martinaxgloria
Copy link
Collaborator

So far, if you want to use the IMU test in icub-tests to test multiple sensors at once, the robot must expose in its yarprobotinterface configuration file a multipleanalogsensorsserver that publishes the orientation measurements for all of available sensors, with a prefix that matches exactly the port parameter of the test (the default one is ${portprefix}/alljoints/inertials).

For this reason, it would be nice to have those files upstream also for iCubV2_* simulated models

cc @Nicogene @pattacini

@martinaxgloria martinaxgloria self-assigned this Mar 8, 2024
@traversaro
Copy link
Member

I totally agree, it would be convenient to have alljoints parts for all type of sensors, also because they can provide a performance benefit for whole-body control applications (fyi @robotology/iit-ami-scrum-masters). Anyhow, I am a bit concerned with simulated models functionality diverging w.r.t. to real robots. Can you at least open an issue in robots-configuration to track adding the same devices to the real robots?

@martinaxgloria
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can you at least open an issue in robots-configuration to track adding the same devices to the real robots?

Sure, I opened an issue:

Maybe it's useful to open a twin issue in ergocub-software

cc @Nicogene

@Nicogene
Copy link
Member

Maybe it's useful to open a twin issue in ergocub-software

If you change the xml of the real erogcub yes 👍🏻

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants