Add #[inline] to array TryFrom impls #111966
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
thomcc
approved these changes
May 25, 2023
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#111936 (Include test suite metadata in the build metrics) - rust-lang#111952 (Remove DesugaringKind::Replace.) - rust-lang#111966 (Add #[inline] to array TryFrom impls) - rust-lang#111983 (Perform MIR type ops locally in new solver) - rust-lang#111997 (Fix re-export of doc hidden macro not showing up) - rust-lang#112014 (rustdoc: get unnormalized link destination for suggestions) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was looking into #111959 and I realized we don't have these. They seem like an uncontroversial addition.
IMO this PR does not fix that issue. I think the bad codegen is being caused by some underlying deeper problem but this change might cause the MIR inliner to paper over it in this specific case.
r? @thomcc