Skip to content

rustdoc: get unnormalized link destination for suggestions #112014

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2023

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #110111

This bug, and the workaround in this PR, is closely linked to raphlinus/pulldown-cmark#441, getting offsets of link components. In particular, pulldown-cmark doesn't provide the offsets of the contents of a link.

To work around this, rustdoc parser parts of a link definition itself.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 27, 2023

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels May 27, 2023
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax branch from 282540e to 7a571d8 Compare May 27, 2023 01:31
Fixes rust-lang#110111

This bug, and the workaround in this commit, is closely linked to
[pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#441], getting offsets of link
components. In particular, pulldown-cmark doesn't provide the
offsets of the contents of a link.

To work around this, rustdoc parser parts of a link definition
itself.

[pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#441]: pulldown-cmark/pulldown-cmark#441
@notriddle notriddle force-pushed the notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax branch from 7a571d8 to 1a77d9a Compare May 27, 2023 01:38
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented May 27, 2023

Thanks for taking over! I got too frustrated trying to fix this

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the PR!

@fmease: yes it's a bit annoying. I'm still hoping that at some point, pulldown-cmark will provide the offset information. It would make things much simpler to handle.

@bors: r=GuillaumeGomez,fmease rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 27, 2023

📌 Commit 1a77d9a has been approved by GuillaumeGomez,fmease

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 27, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 27, 2023
…llaumeGomez

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#111936 (Include test suite metadata in the build metrics)
 - rust-lang#111952 (Remove DesugaringKind::Replace.)
 - rust-lang#111966 (Add #[inline] to array TryFrom impls)
 - rust-lang#111983 (Perform MIR type ops locally in new solver)
 - rust-lang#111997 (Fix re-export of doc hidden macro not showing up)
 - rust-lang#112014 (rustdoc: get unnormalized link destination for suggestions)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 3089653 into rust-lang:master May 27, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone May 27, 2023
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/intra-doc-weird-syntax branch May 27, 2023 15:37
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issues with intra-doc links to core/std derive macros
6 participants