Skip to content

Use more realistic example for thread builder #60078

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2019
Merged

Conversation

matklad
Copy link
Member

@matklad matklad commented Apr 18, 2019

Stack size of 10 bytes does not make any sense: the minimal possible stack size is greater anyway.

Stack size of 10 **bytes** does not make any sense: the minimal possible stack size is greater anyway.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @shepmaster

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 18, 2019
@shepmaster
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 18, 2019

📌 Commit be69785 has been approved by shepmaster

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 18, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
Use more realistic example for thread builder

Stack size of 10 **bytes** does not make any sense: the minimal possible stack size is greater anyway.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
Use more realistic example for thread builder

Stack size of 10 **bytes** does not make any sense: the minimal possible stack size is greater anyway.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
Use more realistic example for thread builder

Stack size of 10 **bytes** does not make any sense: the minimal possible stack size is greater anyway.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
Use more realistic example for thread builder

Stack size of 10 **bytes** does not make any sense: the minimal possible stack size is greater anyway.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2019
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #59915 (Implement event filtering for self-profiler.)
 - #59933 (Make clear that format padding doesn't work for Debug)
 - #60023 (implement specialized nth_back() for Bytes, Fuse and Enumerate)
 - #60032 (Remove unwanted z-index change)
 - #60041 (Simplify the returning of a Result a bit)
 - #60045 (Suggest appropriate path when calling associated item on bare types)
 - #60052 (Correct unused parameter diagnostic)
 - #60056 (Update rustfmt to 1.2.1)
 - #60060 (whitelist RTM x86 target cpu feature)
 - #60061 (Change suggestion of field when not in self context)
 - #60064 (Point at try `?` on errors affecting the err match arm of the desugared code)
 - #60078 (Use more realistic example for thread builder)
 - #60080 (Fix small errors in docs for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.)
 - #60082 (Update miri)
 - #60097 (Use -mergefunc-use-aliases for any LLVM >= 8)
 - #60098 (libcore: deny `elided_lifetimes_in_paths`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit be69785 into rust-lang:master Apr 19, 2019
@matklad matklad deleted the patch-1 branch April 19, 2019 08:59
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants