Skip to content

fix typos and improve clarity in documentation #143176

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kilavvy
Copy link

@kilavvy kilavvy commented Jun 29, 2025

Description:

This pull request corrects minor typos and improves wording for clarity across several documentation files, including:

- Correcting instrinsics → intrinsics
- Correcting preferrably → preferably
- Correcting Orginally → Originally
-  Correcting resiliant → resilient

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 29, 2025

r? @albertlarsan68

rustbot has assigned @albertlarsan68.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-rustc-dev-guide Area: rustc-dev-guide S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 29, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 29, 2025

The rustc-dev-guide subtree was changed. If this PR only touches the dev guide consider submitting a PR directly to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide otherwise thank you for updating the dev guide with your changes.

cc @BoxyUwU, @jieyouxu, @Kobzol, @tshepang

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please squash the commits into one, there's no need for 4 commits for 4 typo fixes

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@rustbot author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 29, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 29, 2025

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

- Update ui.md
- Update type-alias-impl-trait.md
- Update README.md
@kilavvy
Copy link
Author

kilavvy commented Jun 29, 2025

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Jun 29, 2025
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@Kobzol does the stdarch subtree still need a modification hold before its tests are run?

@Kobzol
Copy link
Contributor

Kobzol commented Jun 29, 2025

We won't be running all the tests anytime soon, and the smoke test probably wouldn't catch that many issues, so I don't think we need a modification hold, at least not for small stuff.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

Thanks
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 29, 2025

📌 Commit 897c4ee has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 29, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
A-rustc-dev-guide Area: rustc-dev-guide S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants